[加评论] 页面有问题?请点击打印板-》打印版                  [推荐此文给朋友]
[博讯主页]->[大众观点]
   

杨建利评谷歌事件:除了屈服与退出以外的选择
请看博讯热点:网络封锁和压制

(博讯北京时间2010年1月16日 转载)
    杨建利更多文章请看杨建利专栏
    来源:外交政策 作者:杨建利
     (博讯 boxun.com)

     编者注:近日,公民力量负责人杨建利先生在美国《外交政策》(Foreign Policy) 上撰文《DO NO EVIL》,就谷歌事件作出评论。杨先生认为谷歌事件是一个大事件,他呼吁有识之士以各自的方式推动其往中国网络自由、信息自由的方向发展。(标题为编者所加)
    Do No Evil
    A Tiananmen dissident responds to Google's clash with Beijing over censorship and human rights.
    BY YANG JIANLI | JANUARY 13, 2010
    
    Google's announcement on Tuesday that it had detected "highly sophisticated" attacks on the email accounts of Chinese human rights activists clearly illustrates the consequences of a policy toward China based on a long-standing but faulty argument. For 30 years, Western commentators have argued that expanded human and political rights for Chinese citizens will automatically flow from increased engagement with China on economic and security issues, and other areas of mutual interest. But this thesis is not supported by history -- or my personal experience.
    
    
    In June 1989, I stood in Tiananmen Square with thousands of other Chinese citizens demanding an end to official corruption and advocating for democratic reforms. The Chinese communist regime was then morally bankrupt and floundering. Its rulers were locked in a paralyzing internal debate between hard-liners and reformers. (I urge readers to peruse the memoirs of Zhao Ziyang, who was general secretary of the Communist Party during the Tiananmen pro-democracy movement, to understand just how close Chinese citizens came to bringing democracy to our country.) But our hopes were sorely dashed.
    Today, 20 years later, the same Chinese communist regime rules China. But it is now stronger and bolder. Despite the country's overall economic success and three decades of deepening integration with the world community, the political repression of Chinese citizens continues unabated.
    
    The recent cyberattack on Google is only one example -- albeit a striking one -- of the Chinese rulers' disregard for international standards of human rights. In recent months, nine Uighurs have been executed by the Chinese government without even the hint of a fair trial. On Christmas Eve, the widely respected Chinese intellectual and rights activist Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years in prison for "incitement to subvert the state." His alleged crime was to co-author a treatise, known as "Charter o8," on the failures of the current government and recommendations for bringing to China greater rule of law. One can only imagine what our world will look like 20 years from now if the world's collective policy of acquiescence toward the Chinese government's disregard for law and human rights continues.
    
    This latest event should serve as a wake-up call to the international community to heed the wise words of Soviet-era human rights activist Andrei Sakharov that the world cannot rely on governments that do not rely on their own people. As such, human rights should not be viewed as a distinct issue, but as the very foundation for sustainable and just global partnerships. Despite a clear history demonstrating that acquiescence to tyranny only emboldens tyrants -- and raises the price we all ultimately must pay in defense of freedom -- the current administration still clings to the tenet that human rights, in the words of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, "can't interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis, and the security crisis."
    
    Today, Google deserves the unanimous praise of world governments and the international business community for its brave decision to no longer censor its Chinese search engine, google.cn. This action in defense of its mission to "do no evil" stands in stark contrast with Yahoo's decision, in 2005, to hand over to the Chinese government the private emails of a Chinese journalist, Shi Tao. Those emails were subsequently used to build a case against Shi for "divulging state secrets abroad." He was sent to prison for 10 years. Unfortunately, Yahoo is not alone. Today many companies in the IT sector and other sectors routinely acquiesce to dubious requests by the Chinese government. But as Google now realizes, such cooperation in fact provides no insurance against security breaches and human rights violations in the future.
    
    While I applaud Google's stand, I also caution it not to withdraw from China -- at least, not without a fight. Doing so would only strengthen the control of the Internet by the Chinese government, handing over the search business to Google's well-regulated Chinese competitor, Baidu. Unfortunately, it seems that Google and other foreign companies operating in China are being forced to make a tough choice -- comply with China's harsh rules, or exit. That choice hasn't gotten any easier in the 30 years since China's reform period began. Time hasn't erased the essential friction.
    
    The burden of finding a better path forward, however, shouldn't rest upon the shoulders of one company alone. I urge President Barack Obama's administration, the U.S. Congress, and the U.S. business community to work together to develop principles of engagement, similar to the Sullivan Principles, which were created for dealing with apartheid-era South Africa. Those principles should include a call for a free and uncensored Internet. I believe that a free flow of information, more than anything else, will open the door to freedom. Such steps will help China's rulers realize that they must change their behavior toward their own people if they want to be truly accepted as a member of the world community. (博讯 boxun.com)
(本文只代表作者或者发稿团体的观点、立场)

博讯相关报道(最近20条,更多请利用搜索功能):
  • 与杨建利离婚的说明/傅湘
  • 你的自由是我的自由 你的希望是我的希望/杨建利
  • 说中共政权50年/杨建利
  • 中国的制度要从本质上进行改变/杨建利
  • 就滥用暴力问题写给中国政治警察/杨建利
  • 杨建利:致“六四绿卡”获得者的一封信
  • 524悉尼将举行六四讨论会和公民行/杨建利
  • “六四”造成了中国的道德灾难,人权灾难和环保灾难/杨建利
  • 李长军:民主宪政制度是彻底解决西藏问题的前提-----读杨建利博士的“我倡议的新中间道路”
  • 我倡议的新中间道路/杨建利
  • 杨建利:可见的反对运动、危机、国际社会的支持是中国实现民主的必要条件
  • 杨建利:停止迫害 停止酷刑
  • 阿衍:杨建利是不是被流氓当局关傻了?
  • 杨建利:心灵的解放——再谈《零八宪章》的意义
  • 心灵的解放----再谈《零八宪章》的意义/杨建利
  • 杨建利:实名签署《零八宪章》的意义
  • 杨建利博士致奥巴马总统的公开信/公民自由联盟
  • 民主力量的成长是第一因素/杨建利
  • “六四”二十周年全球纪念活动 /杨建利
  • 杨建利狱中诗集在香港出版/阿海
  • 杨建利博士在2008年12月10日国会记者会上的结语
  • 杨建利在自由亚洲电台节目上呼吁成立三鹿奶粉受害者组织
  • 公民自由联盟成员拜会杨建利博士 (图)
  • 杨建利去四川途中,在香港被拦截
  • 傅湘给杨建利的支持者们的紧急呼吁
  • 希哲老人揭杨建利隐私 --- 捧他,还是损他?


    点击这里对此新闻发表看法
  •    
    联系我们


    All rights reserved
    博讯是畅所欲言的场所、所有文章均不一定代表博讯立场
    声明:博讯由编辑、义务留学生、学者维护,如有版权问题,请联系我们。另外,欢迎其他媒体 转载博讯文章,为尊重作者的辛勤劳动以及所承担风险,尊重博讯广大义务人士的奉献,请转载时注明来源和作者。