[加评论] 页面有问题?请点击打印板-》打印版                  [推荐此文给朋友]
[博讯主页]->[大众观点]
   

写给“中国人权”共同主席呼吁信
(博讯2005年2月18日)
    
    
     中国人权理事会共同主席 (博讯 boxun.com)

    
     亲爱的伯恩斯坦先生:
    
    
    “中国人权”是一个由海外中国人创办,旨在为服务中国人权事业的组织,近年来在您和您的一群美国朋友的帮助和参与下,“中国人权”的财务和运作能力均有所提升,这是我们心存感激的。然而,最近《原“中国人权”部分理事的公开声明》在媒体与互联网广泛传播,它所公开的关于“中国人权”内的问题和争议,令人震惊;而“中国人权”无法调节这些争执,致使大批理事辞职,更使关注人权事业的我们,痛心疾首。
    
    
    同时,我们又都注意到“中国人权”理事会容纳了中国民主运动的若干优秀人物。其中,早在五十年代就与中国共产党分道扬镳的刘宾雁、郭罗基、方励之,在中国民众的心目中是享有崇高声望的。方励之是一个优秀的物理学家,八十年代他还是中国大学校园中自由思想的代表,他优雅的演讲至今还能令人激情澎湃;郭罗基一位是思维缜密而敏锐的哲学家,又是投身民主运动的勇敢斗士,他鞭笞毛泽东的言论曾在中国风靡一时;刘宾雁是共产主义革命的一员老战士,却数度因良心罪而遭受共产主义的清洗,最后被逐出自己的祖国。
    
    方励之、郭罗基、刘宾雁是中国异见分子中的中坚人物,八十年代中国的思想自由化运动,是在他们有力的参与下逐步形成的。而今天,拥有这样的“校园青年的导师”、“民主运动的头脑”、“中国人民的良心”作为自己的理事会的成员,“中国人权”应将他们视为精神财富。其他辞职的人中还有王渝和李晓蓉等人,他们都是非常具有献身精神的人,十几年来对中国人权贡献很大。
    
    现在十几位理事同时辞职,将使现余十六位理事中的中国理事只剩五人,无疑会大大削弱“中国人权”的信用。关于这一后果,林培瑞(Perry Link)教授已有阐述,当然也是您所不愿意看到的。
    
    至于《原“中国人权”部分理事的公开声明》以及最近發表的中国人权理事会声明中所说到的细节,我们无法了解其因果,但是,我们恳请“中国人权”以大局为重,努力挽留已辞职理事,并运用民主程序解决内部的问题。
    
    
    
    
    签名:
    
    
    
    陈 世 超,Henry Chau, 傅正明,高寒, 黄翔, 毛国良,林庶人,李洪宽,刘国凯,吕京花, 吕易, 茉莉, 司马璐, 唐捷, 吴方城, 谢中之, 许万平,杨锦霞,羊子, 张小刚, 张国亭, 张玲, 朱学渊。
    
    
    
    
    
    
    To: Co-chair of the Board of Directors, Human Rights in China
    
    
    
    Dear Mr. Bernstein,
    
    
    
    “Human Rights in China” is an organization created by Chinese outside China with the objective of serving the cause of human rights in China. In recent years, thanks to the help and involvement by you and your American friends, HRIC has grown in its financial and operational capacities. For this, we are very grateful. However, having read the Public Statement by Former Board Members of HRIC circulated in the media and on the Internet, we are shocked by the problems and controversies inside HRIC. The failure to adjudicate these disputes within HRIC has led to the resignation of many Board members. For those of us who are concerned about the cause of human rights, this is very painful.
    
    
    
    Meanwhile, we recognize that HRIC’s Board have over the years gathered many of the most distinguished figures in the Chinese democracy movement. Among them are Liu Binyan, Guo Louji and Fang Lishi, who parted the Chinese Communist Party in the 1950s. They enjoy the finest reputation in the hearts of the Chinese public. Fang Lizhi is a distinguished physicist. He represented liberal ideas on Chinese university campuses in the 1980s. His graceful public speeches continue to inspire and motivate people today. Guo Louji is a sharp-minded and rigorous philosopher, a brave soldier devoted to the democracy movement. His indictment of Mao Zedong once swept China. Liu Binyan was an old soldier in the Communist Revolution, but he was eventually exiled from his motherland after having been repeatedly purged by the communists due to the “crime” of free conscience.
    
    
    
    Fang Lizhi, Guo Louji, and Liu Binyan are hard-core figures in the Chinese dissident community. Their persistent efforts in the 1980s gradually fostered the Chinese movement of liberal ideas. Today, having these figures on its Board, HRIC must treat as its treasures of inspiration the “leader of university youth,” “the brain of democracy movement,” and “the conscience of the Chinese people.” The other resigned Board members include Wang Yu and Li Xiaorong, who are deeply committed and made tremendous contributions to human rights in China.
    
    
    
    After the current resignation, only five of the sixteen Chinese Board members remain. This will no doubt significantly weaken the reputation of HRIC. Prof. Perry Link has explicated these consequences, which of course are not what you want to see happening.
    
    
    
    As for the details mentioned in the Public Statement by Former HRIC Board Members, and in a new statement by corrent HRIC Board Members, we are not in a position to confirm the causes and effects. However, we sincerely ask HRIC to put first what is the most important, try its best to keep the resigned Board members, and follow democratic procedures to solve its internal problems.
    
    
    
    With best regards,
    
    
    
    Signed
    
    Dick Chan, Henry Chau, Fu Zhenming, Gao Han, Huang Xiang, Mao,Guoliang, Lin Shuren Li Hongkuan, Liu Guokai, Lu Jinghua, lv Louis, Moli, Tang Jie, Frank Wu, Xie Zhongzhi Xu Wanping, Anna Cheung, Yang Zi, Zhang Xiaogang, Zhang Gouting, Zhang ling, James Zhu (博讯 boxun.com)
博讯相关报道(最近20条,更多请利用搜索功能):
  • 全球营救呼吁国际律师界关注高智晟律师的安全
  • 杨天水:呼吁何时了
  • 彭迪:悼念赵紫阳 呼吁从头越
  • 任不寐:胡石根一案及救援呼吁
  • 冯岩: 呼吁立即释放张林,给予国家赔偿
  • 江苏荣:“关于上访和民主人士的呼吁书,并告香港市民和全国被拆迁户同胞书”
  • 援赵义工小组:胡锦涛,听不听由你!——呼吁释放赵紫阳签名者留言选编
  • 独立中文作家笔会狱中作家委员会关于作家张倩夫被判刑的呼吁书
  • 为六四伤残者齐志勇捐款的呼吁信
  • 呼吁密切关注“反分裂国家法”立法一事!
  • 范子良:为王金波先生呼吁
  • 曾节明:呼吁关注李洪宽先生近况
  • 呼吁:关注大参考,关注李宏宽先生
  • 读者来信:呼吁关注雷江涛被非法判刑
  • 水镜:一起来呼吁“公民团队精神,以提高我们公民的自我保护能力! ”
  • 李国涛:感谢和呼吁
  • 援赵义工小组呼吁给赵紫阳自由并启动全球网上签名活动启动(图)
  • 紧急救援受难民运战友“百日呼吁”活动
  • 陈泱潮:恳切呼吁帮助清水君上诉案律师费用
  • 忍看英雄沉黑狱,共将悲愤诉同胞!------关于要求释放政治犯的呼吁书!
  • 呼吁签名声援张林的公开信
  • 上海疑现流脑官员呼吁镇静
  • 华邮:万里、田纪云呼吁为赵平反
  • 紧急呼吁:博讯文坛应进入RSF的Blog评选
  • 辩护律师郭国汀获准会见杨天水—呼吁保障政治犯的基本人权
  • 《公民维权网》呼吁公民哀悼赵紫阳
  • 呼吁书:在赵紫阳逝世的日子,重返天安门
  • 张林失踪 妻子被监控 刘晓波等呼吁援救
  • 张林十天无音讯 妻子朋友紧急呼吁援救
  • 中国呼吁对互联网进行更加严格的监管(图)
  • 家人朋友呼吁营救杨天水
  • 抗议警方迫害杨天水 网上征签呼吁信
  • 签名呼吁:强烈抗议警方违法侵犯人权迫害杨天水
  • 关于师涛案致中国最高当局的呼吁书
  • 杨振宁即将再婚 清华呼吁尊重个人选择 (图)
  • 美议员呼吁中国释放工人毛恒凤
  • 空军中将作家刘亚洲呼吁中国及早政改
  • 师涛弟弟师华的紧急呼吁
  • 傅湘给杨建利的支持者们的紧急呼吁
  • 要求对“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”作出司法解释的呼吁信
  • 李健:有关黄静案致各界的呼吁书
  • 吴文秀老汉呼吁书:政府可以放火,百姓就不许点灯吗?
  • 一个女博士生为在看守所死亡的弟弟呼吁
  • 丁子霖: 为李思怡之死呼吁
  • 呼吁中国政府:不要给你最劳苦的公民以“罪犯待遇”和“疯子待遇”
  • 南方都市报披露惊人案例,呼吁收容遣送尽快立法
  • 外来工没暂住证丢命 媒体呼吁荒唐执法该结束
  • 给中共16大全体代表的一封公开信:呼吁恢复前总书记赵紫阳同志的人身自由
  • 冤枉无辜, 包庇犯罪, 国际都市上海竟然发生国际冤案:一个被称为“蛀虫”的回国留学生呼吁司法公正
  • 响应网友,再为生命的权利呼吁!!!
  • 救救烟台新世纪高中───一个“现代武训”的呼吁书


    点击这里对此新闻发表看法
  •    
    联系我们


    All rights reserved
    博讯是畅所欲言的场所、所有文章均不一定代表博讯立场
    声明:博讯由编辑、义务留学生、学者维护,如有版权问题,请联系我们。另外,欢迎其他媒体 转载博讯文章,为尊重作者的辛勤劳动以及所承担风险,尊重博讯广大义务人士的奉献,请转载时注明来源和作者。