百家争鸣
为了方便阅读,博讯暂停广告播放,博迅需要您的支持。
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[A Chinese Human Right lawyer’s story by Guo Guoting]
郭国汀律师专栏
·爱因斯坦宗教上帝相关言论第二集
·论中共专制暴政下的宗教信仰自由(英文)
·四海之内皆兄弟人类本是一家人
·人类不平等的起源究竟是什么?
·质疑东海君之《良知大法》
·祝愿祖国早日实现真正的自由!
·关于司法公正的讨论郭国汀律师在北大法律信息网上发表了非常危险的错误观点应该予以驳斥!
·我的真实心声
·中共当局封杀言论为那般?
·六四的记忆
·谈中华文化与道德重建(四)
·中国百年最伟大的文字!
·郭国汀:为刘荻女英雄辩护吾当仁不让!
·只有思想言论出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
·只有说真话的民族才有前途
·一个能思想的人才是力量无边的人/南郭
·思想之可贵在于其独立性
·独立思想是最美的
·思想的高度统一是人类社会之大敌
·统一思想之谬误由来已久矣/南郭
·我的心里话--有感于杜导斌先生被捕
***法治研究
·什么是法治?
·法治的目的
·法治与民主的前提与条件
·法治的起源与历史
·开明专制与法治--极权流氓暴政下决无法治生存的余地
·法治的基石和实质
·法治的精神
·一篇值得推介的法治论文杰作/郭国汀
***民主研究
·自由宪政民主政治的七项实质要件
·谁是真正的人类政治民主之父?
·民主就是[山头林立]?!
·质疑刘晓波先生盛赞俞可平民主论 郭国汀
·共和比民主更为根本
·共和民主宪政要旨
·什么是联邦主义民主宪政?
***中国民主运动研究
·公平游戏规则公平竞争是第一价值原则
·暴力革命与和平演变的前提与条件
·民运内部必须是平等尊重基础上充分争论协商妥协式的真诚合作
·退出自由中国论坛的公开声明
·陈尔晋与张国堂之争的性质
·我的几个基本观点答张国堂先生公开信
·中国民运战略研究
·中国民运当前面临问题与对策研究
·郭国汀加入民主中国阵线的公开声明
·论公推中国民运政治领袖的必要性
·论公推自荐公选民运政治精神领袖的紧迫性
·中国民主运动领袖论?答方文武先生
·关于筹建过渡政府与公选民运领袖问题的讨论
·关于民运领袖过渡政府与程序正义的争论
·历史功臣还是历史罪人?
·关于成立临时或流亡政府我的原则与立场
·中国民主运动到底需要什么样的政治精神领袖?
·谁是中国民主运动政治精神领袖的最佳人选?
·谁是中共极权专制暴政最害怕的劲敌?
·中国民运长期四分五裂的根源何在?
·郭国汀:唯有程序正义才能根治中国民运四分五裂顽症
·自私是否人的本性?
·郭国汀:汪兆钧信是中共内部爆炸的一颗原子弹
·严正责令胡锦涛及中共当局——立即无条件释放民运志士李国涛!
·反抗中共专制暴政的先驱者与英雄(修正)
·相会伟大的刘文辉烈士英魂
·敬请胡锦涛先生立即制止下属恶意疯狂攻击南郭之电脑
·"六四领袖去死吧!"及 " 逢共必反、逢华必反"?!
·草根吾友欲往何处去?
·真实的陈泱潮故事
·陈泱潮自传之二
·强烈推荐国人必读之最佳政论文
·答小溪先生质疑
·驳斥草虾兼与草根商榷!
·语言风格——关于袁红冰改良还是革命的争论
·就袁红冰之《改良还是革命》与申先生的论战/郭国汀
·英雄人格哲学—袁红冰《自由在落日中》读后
·划时代的政论——简评袁红冰《改良,还是革命?》
·为什么袁红冰之《改良,还是革命?》是划时代的政论?
·伟大的中国文化复兴宣言 郭国汀
·罗马尼亚35天革命成功真相
·关于宣讲人权公约基金申请推荐函
·必须立即终止反动透顶的行政官员任命制
·关于暴力革命答深山质疑
·自由中国论坛的不锈钢老鼠到底是什么角色?
·关注李宇宙的命运
***陈泱潮思想评论
·大器晚成——《陈泱潮文集选读》序
·《造化故事》陈泱潮文选第一集
·铁幕惊雷《特权论》陈泱潮文选第二集
·《偃武修文重新建国纲领》陈泱潮文选第三集
·《时政评论》陈泱潮文选第四集
·《天命前定》陈泱潮文选第五集
·《上帝之道》陈泱潮文选第六集
·中国争人权言论表达自由权的先驱者与英雄名录
·民主革命论 陈泱潮
·《特权论的》精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判
·特权论的精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判 郭国汀
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
A Chinese Human Right lawyer’s story by Guo Guoting


   A Chinese
    Human Right lawyer’s story
   by Guoting Guo
   Brief introduction
   I have been practicing as a maritime lawyer for 20 years. and two year ago decide to be a human right lawyer. For I learn so many young talent people were arrested and sentence into prison only for out spoken. So I publish articles online to express my opinion on Chinese Communist Party’s policies, judicial system, political system, and rule of law. And started to defended political dissident and cyber writer and journalist Ever since June 2003, as the defense lawyer of Mr.Zheng Enchong, I have become a Chinese Human Right lawyer and have been the defense lawyer of political prisoners of conscience, such as Mr.Huang Junqiu, Mr.Yang Tianshui, Mr.Shi Tao, and Mr.Zhang Lin; residents who were forcefully evicted from their homes, such as Ms.Ma Yalian and Ms. Wang Shuizheng; Falun Gong practitioners, such as Mr.Qi Yanlai, Mr.Chen Guanghui, and Mr.Lei Jiangtao. I was thereafter harassed and revenged by the Chinese government. On February 23rd,2005, Shanghai Judicial Bureau suspended my lawyer license and took my computer away. Even worse, the Chinese police searched my home and my office again on March 6th,2005, then detained me, released me on bail, and put me under house arrest under extreme strict surveillance till May 20th,2005. My family was constantly harassed by telephone tapping. This is the first declared Chinese Human Right lawyer’s real situation in China. The full and detailed story is as follows:
   
   I The First case of suspending license practicing law for so called breach Constitution in China
   1.The advocacy of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and freedom of press
   2.Openly Against The One Party Dictatorship with Extreme Power
   3.Criticized the possibility of communism and openly expressed “no love for communist party” and “the end of communist party will come soon”.
   4.appeal to for Chinese Human Right lawyers
   5.Against Mr.Hu Jintao’s extreme power of the Nation
   6.Publish the defense statement on Internet and Request for the Party member judges’avoidance of suspicion
   7.Show my intension and desire to represent for the political consciences
   8.critisize the policy of Tian Anmei Massacre
   9.Criticize the policy to overturn the spiritual movement of Falungong
   Summary,
   my speech and action mainly focused on fighting for freedom of thought, freedom of speech and press; fighting against one party’s extreme dictatorship; calling on a genuine judicial system; accusing the crimes of the Communist Party committed to the Tian Anmei Squire Student Democracy Movement, as well as Fa Lungong’s spiritual movement.
   II Revenge
   1 lost the right to practice law
   2 lost the freedom: detained and bail out
   under house arrest.
   3 Forced to self-criticize
   4 Forced to sign written pledge
    (drafted by The Authority)
   Written pledge drafted by the Authority
   I, Guoting Guo, for the sake of personal interest and fame, I published several irresponsible essays on Internet and other public places. I intentionally denigrated Chinese current political system and judicial system. These behaviours have seriously violated the lawyer’s profession morality, and have caused irrecoverable negative impact and social damage. …...the government gave me great help and care. ….. I feel very repentant for my speech and essay. I thank the government for its timely help so that I do not go too far in the wrong way. I hereby thank the Government’s help and education. …… I promise that:
    From now on, I shall not contact the “Independent Chinese Pen Committee” and any other similar organizations and relevant staff; I shall refuse any request immediately if they contact me; I promise not to join any organizations, not to attend any activities, not to accept any sponsorship;
   During this research meeting, I shall keep silent and not address any issues. During the period of further education or job application, I shall not contact anyone who is irrelevant to academic research or job application;
   I shall no longer touch the politically sensitive cases, i.g. Mr.Shi Tao, Zhang Lin, Yang Tianshui, Zheng Enchong, Huang Junqiu and Fa Lungong, forced eviction victims, and labor disputers; I shall not contact anyone who is involved in the cases; I shall not recommend any other lawyers to handle the cases; I shall not offer legal aid; I shall not attend any petition or supporting activities under any circumstances. Meanwhile, from now on, I guarantee that I shall not contact Shanghai residents Ms.Jiang Meili and Ms.Li Jianhong;(After I go abroad, I shall not contact any Fa Lungong organizers overseas (handwritten here).
   I will not organize, involve, or attend any activities, such as “human right lawyers training class”.
   I shall not publish any political articles and other irresponsible essays on Internet and other unsuitable places, especially those which criticize China political system and legal system;
   I shall keep low key and not accept any overseas media’s interview. If I have to accept the interview, I shall not make any comments on state affairs. In particular, I shall not deliver any message that attacks and defames Chinese government;
    I guarantee that I shall not attend or involve in any activities that may jeopardize the state security and damage the state interest;
   I swear with my good name to keep the above promises. If I breach any of the above clauses, I shall be cast aside by the whole world.
   9 May, 2005
   5 final version of forced written pledge
   Finally under the pressure of the police, I was forced to write down the following promise, in handwriting:
   I, Guo Guoting, male, was born in Chang Ding of FuJian Province on 10 January 1958. I was the previous senior partner of Shanghai Tian-yee Law Firm. During these years, I conceitedly published several political essays to criticize political system and judicial system, which objectively caused some negative impact. On 4 March, 2005, I was given one year administrative punishment by the Shanghai Justice Bureau. I now recognize that I had some faults such as being so arrogant that I indeed should not have made public comments in some unsuitable places. Some of these comments did not comply with the reality of China. My analysis and judgments also had some errors, which did not truly reflect the objective situation. Now I recognize I have made some mistakes and would like to go abroad to attend an international meeting and try to find a job in USA or Canada, I promise:
   1. I shall keep away from politics and promise not to join any political organization. I shall not attend any political activities, nor to receive any sponsorship from Chinese state enemy;
   2. During the meeting, I shall keep low key and not make any speech. During my future education and job application, I shall not contact anyone who is irrelevant to academic research and job application;
   3. I shall no longer act as the defense lawyer of any politically sensitive cases, i.g. Mr.Shi Tao, Zhang Lin, Yang Tianshui, Zheng Enchong, Huang Junqiu and Fa Lungong, forced eviction victims, labor dispute. I shall not attend any petition or supporting activities. I shall not contact any FLG’s organizers overseas;
   4. I shall not organize, involve, or attend any activities, such as “human right lawyer training class”.
   5. I shall not publish any political articles on Internet, especially those that criticize China political system and legal system;
   6. I shall not accept any oversea media’s interview. If I have to, I shall not deliver any message that attacks and defames Chinese government;
   7. I shall not attend or involve in any activities that might jeopardize the state security and damage the state interest.
   III Comment and conclusion
    In a country where human right lawyers can hardly even protect his/her own fundamental human rights, how can one expect a decent good record of human rights? I was a senior lawyer who have been practicing law for more than twenty years in China. Coincidentally, I became a China human right lawyer two years ago. I declared to become a Chinese human right lawyer openly in Feb 2004. All I did were some publish of essays criticizing the Communist Party’s policy of Tiananmen Massacre Fa Lungong’s spiritual movement, political system and legal system, some cynical comments on the Four Basic Principle, and defending for several political consciences and Fa Lungong’s practitioners. In return, the Shanghai Justice Bureau suspended my lawyer license for one years; the police put me under house arrest and under strict surveillance for two and a half months! They also cut off my home phone telephone lines and seized my mobile phone. They even carried out 24 hours surveillance and forced me to give up bringing lawsuit against the Justice Bureau. Even worse, they illegally took away my dairy and relevant case files. Finally, they forced me to write this so-called guarantee which of course has no legal and moral binding whatsoever. The purpose of all these is to totally destroy my law career, and, at the same time, to warn and threat other China lawyers from taking human right cases.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场