政党社团之声
为了方便阅读,博讯暂停广告播放,博迅需要您的支持。
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[Beckoning Burma]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·由红色高棉想到缅甸军政府
·缅甸掸族的61周年掸邦节
·克伦族掸族领袖游说欧盟6年15次
·平等、民主、发展——救缅甸!
·与赛万赛谈2008年初缅甸局势
·缅甸联邦民族委员会对曼侠被杀害之声明
·人倒下,但曼侠英魂永远活着!
·缅甸革命师生痛失曼侠学兄
·曼侠名列缅甸军政府刺杀单
·谈缅甸国民大会、公投、普选
·美国教授讲缅甸的过去现在未来
·反对缅甸5月公投与2010年普选?
·国际缅甸僧伽总会拜访海牙UNPO
·正视缅甸宪法公投与大选
·缅甸问题以和为贵、利民为本
·缅甸独裁政府——你不打,他不倒!
·缅甸联邦民族委员会有关“宪法公投”声明
·国民党马与民进党谢的选后感言
·温教授评缅甸公投与大选
·NCUB的缅甸反法西斯63周年声明
·达赖喇嘛发表“对全球华人的呼吁”
·“黃金甲--詩篇”
·寒竹点评 “达赖言论”
·缅甸另两大力量对宪法公决的声明
·缅甸在野另七党派反对宪法公决
·给斯宾诺莎的信
·缅甸在野众党派对停战集团的呼吁
·请国际监察员来缅甸察督全民公投
·缅甸钦族委员会第二周年大会声明
·分离运动与自决权问题
·缅甸僧伽新年祈祷民主快来
·Burmese Monks Pray for Democracy
·达赖、缅藏、僧伽喇嘛、背后黑手
·UNPO第九届大会将在欧洲议会召开
·缅甸僧伽昭告人民书
·缅甸国内外僧伽民众4月26日反宪法公投
·缅甸工联FTUB向国际控诉
·缅甸联邦民族委员会五一劳动节声明
·中国学者谈缅甸民主前景
·缅甸僧伽对国际救济的紧急呼吁
·送缅甸将军们上国际刑事法庭
·Deliver the Junta of Burma to the International Criminal Court
·缅甸新宪法、军政府、反对势力
·缅甸反对党派不承认伪宪法与公投结果
·熊飞骏:马英九胜选的十大启示
·民意转求真正缅甸联邦制——不闹独立了
·缅甸众民族团结阵线12党不承认伪公投伪结果
·缅甸风灾,丹瑞大将有话说
·缅甸妇联要扭送丹瑞集团到国际刑事法庭
·缅甸反对力量、军政府、国际刑事法庭
·缅甸军政府要吃掉停战集团了
·缅甸军政府逼迫停战集团缴械参选
·缅人与团体到国际刑事法庭状告缅甸将军们
·缅甸人民恳求联合国:驱逐非法军政府!
·缅甸掸邦第四特区不任军政府宰割!
·反对军政府代表缅甸出席联合国2008年大会
·缅甸民选议员致函联合国与安理会
·缅甸教授与书生座谈“德先生”
·缅甸人民为何痛恨8——尤其8888?
·明天会更老还是更好?
·悲欢离合+生老病死
·秘方:马铃薯胡萝卜苹果三鲜榨汁
·温教授貌强合述缅甸的过去与现在
·对温教授貌强合述缅甸史之补充-1
·缅甸是东南亚另一只经济小虎?
·为2010年大选,甘巴里再访缅甸
·缅甸军政府撕毁停战协定?
·联合国与欧美对风灾后缅甸改变策略
·缅甸东掸邦民族民主自治区岌岌可危
·看佤邦联军如何死里求生
·美国加州缅华移民思想言行录
·恸上世纪60年代南洋排华
·后溪穴治腰酸背痛近视眼花
·蹲功——改善糖尿血压心肺功能
·联合国须送缅甸将军们上国际刑事法庭!
·缅甸掸邦四大特区坚决保家卫邦
·缅甸17停战组织与民主联合党
·缅甸军政府对东北众土族磨刀霍霍
·中风要三小时内急救!
·KNU苏沙吉七访西班牙
·缅甸果敢特区被攻陷了!
·强烈谴责缅甸军政府对果敢人民的暴行!
·战争是缅甸军政府特意发动的!
·缅甸果敢,君知多少?
·缅甸佤邦联军枕戈待旦决战
·果敢已沦陷,下个受害邦该谁?
·赛万赛与貌强谈大缅族主义的民族压迫
·果敢彭家声与伊洛瓦底记者的谈话
·缅甸众土族以小人之心度君子之腹?
·来电为缅官白所成喊冤平反
·缅甸僧伽与学生要求军政府停止民族压迫
·缅甸果敢沦陷区昨晚的来电
·联合国的人权宣言,缅甸不用遵守?
·华夏人道主义救援队缅北来电实录
·缅甸反对势力在2010年大选前的动态
·缅甸反对党派反对2010年伪大选的联合声明
·缅甸新宪法判众土族死刑
·东帝汶总统对缅甸与联合国的疾呼
·旅美缅甸民主力量反对2010年大选
·看昂山素姬缅甸民盟如何进退
·速开缅甸三方会议
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Beckoning Burma

   ======================

   S.H.A.N. & Burma’s News Published by Burma’s Chinese

   Contact & UNsubscribe: BurmaChinese@yahoo.com 貌强

   Website: http://www.boxun.com/hero/Burma'sChinese

   ======================

   By John Lewis Tucker

   October 23, 2005

   (John Lewis Tucker is senior research assistant at the National DefenseCouncil Foundation, The Washington Times Commentary)

   In recent years, the Chinese government has beckoned troubled Burma underits wing, and the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), Burma'soppressive military regime, becomes more compliant with China every year.

   As Burma's largest trading partner and a constant source of arms, China is a large financier of the regime. In return for more than 1 billion worth of arms since 1990, the SPDC recently allowed China to build its first military base on the Indian Ocean, providing China access to every sea frontier in Southeast Asia. As it benefits from American disinterest in the area, China continues fostering SPDC ties.

   This is very dangerous for the U.S. and global proponents of democracy asthe world braces itself for the Second Cold War.

   In addition to the enormous strategic benefits Burma could hold fordemocracy, the international community faces a moral obligation to impedethe military's tyranny. The SPDC oversees and executes a political agendarife with social transgressions against minorities and political opposition.

   Its most notable prisoner is Nobel laureate and leader of the NationalLeague for Democracy (NLD) Aung Sun Suu Kyi, under house arrest for nearlytwo decades. However, when the U.S. proposed a formal discussion of SuuKyi's release at the U.N. in 2004, Russia and China vetoed the issue before it reached the table.

   To punish the Burma regime, the U.S. has pursued harsh economic sanctions.However, as a recent article in the Economist notes, American allies likethe European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)are conducting an economic plan in Burma completely contrary to that of the United States.

   Even if the U.S. manages to coax its allies into matching its harsh economic policy, the SPDC will be forced to cement its strong ties with China. The resulting isolation would punish only the regime's victims, as it has in North Korea.

   These victims desperately anticipate more involvement from the U.S. and itallies. The U.S. invasion of Iraq inspired hope among the oppressed Burmese and fear among the generals, who nervously prepare to move government headquarters 400 miles inland to a fortified, 10-square-mile military complex.

   While bitter toward the regime, locals are also unhappy with the Chinese.Last month, a former member of the Burmese Communist Party, Aung Kyaw Zaw,expressed to the Irrawaddy, a Burmese news organization, his belief China is ravaging Burma's resources without considering the consequences. "They are supporting the people who are ruining the country," he said, "a lot ofpeople in Burma hate the Chinese."

   Despite its tyranny, the regime does not entirely oppose democracy, at least not outwardly. In the last decade, it met twice to create a constitution, and in 2003 outlined a seven-point plan to move toward democracy.

   Although it is widely assumed these efforts are simply props to quellinternational pressure, they are at least a small gesture of compliance.However, to achieve tangible democratic progress, the U.S. must act at first in concert with Burma's other potential democratic partners, namely India, the EU and ASEAN.

   This coalition must present the regime with a list of demands, including arevised and legitimate plan for democratization, release of Suu Kyi, aconstitution allowing representation of regime opponents, and eventually, a free, valid election.

   In return for each political concessions, the democratic coalition musteliminate trade barriers and provide more financial aid to nurture thegrowing government.

   The only way the U.S. can secure Burma as an ally is to outbid China witheconomic and political support. By offering more aid and protectionalongside a daunting coalition of democratic nations, the U.S. can woo this troubled nation away from China's beckoning hand. Despite the grotesque social abuses by the regime and China's military 开发exploitation, the Bush administration's cold shoulder says Burma is unworthy of our support and unnecessary to our cause.

   Historically, it has not been U.S. policy to abandon people in need, but we need to act soon before China clenches its fist on this helpless nation.

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场