百家争鸣
为了方便阅读,博讯暂停广告播放,博迅需要您的支持。
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    天亮
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[天亮]->[LetterOct.28,2001]
天亮
·中国往何处去?
·次贷危机和投资浅谈
·美国大选——经济,自由主义,自由派
·宗教知识扫盲(1)
·韩家亮:美国大选——答《为自由派一辩》和《为自由派再辩》兼谈伊拉克战争
·韩家亮:“自由、民主、人权”是普世价值
·语言的困惑
·CND1
·美国的左中右与我们(1)
·宗教知识 Religion 1.0
·圣经浅谈
·错在哪?(上)
·韩家亮:经济学,经济危机,经济政策
·错在哪?(下)
·关于当前经济危机的几点看法
·中国统一之探讨(1)
·实践是检验真理的唯一标准吗?
·中国统一之探讨(2)
·反恐之战(一)
·Economy 1
·Bible1
·Bible2
·种族歧视与宗教
·Noble Prizes
·中国统一之商讨
·经济速评(1)
·stock8-29-09
·伊拉克战争,美国大选,及其他
·经济速评(2)
·stock8-31-09
·stock9-2-09
·stock9-5-09
·Bible2
·faith1
·LetterOct.28,2001
·economy2
·stock9-8-09
·economy3
·反恐之战(一)
·Vision 异象
·On Religious Freedom in China
·3fronts
·Judaism
·JimWallis
·也谈力拓案
·经济学入门谈
·中俄民主进程比较
·LETMYPEOPLEGO!
·WarOnTerror1
·AreWeReady?
·economy4
·truth1
·economy5
·反恐之战(二)
·faith2
欢迎在此做广告
LetterOct.28,2001

I want to share my thoughts on recent terrorist events.
   For many of us came from mainland China, misinformation
   by the Chinese government causes much misunderstanding of
   recent events.
   
   The root of recent conflict has origin in politics,
   nationalities, and most of all in religion. However,
   Islam itself does not teach killing innocent victims.
   There is one good article analyzing recent terrorist
   attack:
   
   www.cnd.org/HXWZExpress/01/09/010924-1.gb.html
   
   Because the Western culture, represented by democracy,
   freedom, tolerance, material wealth, has strong
   influence on Islamic countries (especially the wealth).
   This causes a conflict within Islam society. Those
   who want to follow Islam culture strictly felt
   threatened. Thus, there is a reaction to Western culture.
   US is the center of Western culture, thus, naturally
   their target. No matter what US does, US will be their
   target. Their purpose is to drag the whole world
   backward to their idealism. No wonder Bush declared
   that civilization and freedom are under threat.
   Their hatred toward wealth can be seen by choosing
   World Trade Center as a major target.
   
   Some may question if US does not support Israel, US
   might not be attacked. This might be true to certain
   extent. The problem is that many from mainland China
   do not know many historical facts. Before World War II,
   both Jews and Arabs lived in current Israel and Palestine
   place, although Jews were much fewer. The place was
   under British rule. In 1948, because the world
   community felt that Jews should have own country in
   part in response to Nazi's persecution, Israel was
   established under United Nations sponsorship. A Palestine
   state was also established at the time. However, Palestines
   never recognize Israel and no Arab countries recognized then
   Israel. On the countrary, Arabs wanted to destroy
   Israel completely. In fact, the three middle East wars all
   started by Arabs to destroy Israel. Despite Israel
   faced enemies 10-20 times larger, every time Israel
   won. These are miracles, and the God's will.
   I will address this in detail later. Israel's victories
   had helps from US and other western countries. US has
   several reasons to support Israel. But the primary
   reason is similar to Kuwait, US would not allow Israel
   to be destroyed by Arab countries.
   
   To understand the hatred of Islam fundamentalists toward
   Israel, recall why former Egypt president Sadat was
   assasinated. After several wars lost to Israel, Sadat
   realized that peace and coexistence with Israel is good
   to Egypt. Thus, under his leadership Egypt is the
   first Arab country to recognize Israel. He became one
   of most hated by Islam fundamentalists. In fact, some
   terrorists of 911 incident and Bin Laden's associates
   were from the same Egypt terrorist orginization killed
   Sadat.
   
   US policy is largely within UN. In fact, recently
   US presured Israel and Palestine to negotiate settlement.
   One main problem is that Palestine, and many radical
   Arab countries, does not want Israel to live. US
   is more favorable toward Israel because (1) Israel
   needs support because it is small and encircled by
   enemies who want to destroy it. (2) Israel values
   on democracy, freedom are closer to US.
   
   Previous Chinese government policy favors Arabs because
   geopolical considerations, in particular, anti-US
   setiment. China wanted to represent 3rd world countries
   and their are more Arab countries. There is no moral
   justification to support Arab countries at all.
   
   Judaism (Jews' religion), Islam, and Christianality all
   came from the same origin, Judaism. There are several
   common believes among them: (1) There is only one God;
   (2) God is spirit and hates worshipping idols, including
   any images made by man or naturally; (3) God is
   almighty who created everything of the world. First
   there is Judaism, whose teaching was largely based on
   old testment of the Bible. Jews country, Israel, had
   glorious past. Because Jews sinned (did not obey God),
   God let Israel be destroyed many years before Jesus
   were born. At that time, Jews were looking for a Savoir,
   promised by prophets, for hundreds years. Then, Jesus
   came. Christian are Jews, and others, who believe that
   Jesus is the Savoir promised by God. Those who are
   still waiting for a Savior are Jews. About 400-500
   years after Jesus, an Arab named Muhammad who had
   a vision he claimed from God and established Islam
   religion. Islam followed Judaism and claims 5 great
   prophets from God including Abraham, Moses, Jesus and
   Muhammad and claims Muhammad is the last and the greatest
   prophet. Islam's teaching has a fundamental flaw. No
   one can claim Jesus is from God and yet not believe his
   word. Firt, Jesus said that he is only Son of God. How can
   some one late claims that he is greater than Jesus? In
   John 11:25, Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and
   the life; ... No one can claim this except God. Jesus
   was crucified and resurrected. Muhammad died and was
   burried. How can his follower claims that Jesus is from
   God yet Muhammad was greater than Jesus? According to
   Jesus teaching, no one can be greater than him. From logic
   viewpoint, Islam is inconsistent. Either you accept that
   Jesus is from God or you believe that he is not. You cannot
   have both ways.
   
   The true dividing line is not the above historical facts and
   inconsistency. The testing point is whether the nature of
   God is love. All the above believes acknowledge that God
   is not confined by an image, is almighty, is just, and is
   the creator of the world. Christian believe that above all
   that God is love. Otherwise one cannot understand that God
   would sacrifice his only Son to save sinners. (Sin is also
   not well understood by mainland Chinese; sin is not crime.
   God is righteous. Anyone who is not perfect in God's eye
   is a sinner.) If you believe that God is love, it is not
   hard to accept that God sends his only Son to sacrifice for
   us. It is hard for Jews and Islam to accept this.
   
   Another important fact from the Bible is that Jesus fortold
   the reestablishment of Israel. This and the prediction of
   coming of Jesus hudreds years before his birth are important
   testimony of God's work. We know how difficult to predict
   things. Yet Jesus 2000 years ago predicted that Israel will
   reestablish. In fact, this is the sign before his return.
   This indeed is a miracle.
   
   Christian viewpoint toward Jews has some role in US policy
   in the Arab-Israel conflict. Since Jews are God's chosen
   people according to the Bible, Christian should be good
   toward Jews. Although Jews sinned and were punished
   by God (clearly shown in the Bible), anyone who persecuted
   Jews were punished harshly by God. It is understandable
   that US is supportive of Israel (1) from moral point; (2)
   from believe point. US does want Palestine and Israel to
   coexist peacefully.
   
   US policy toward middle East is based on some basic US values.
   The problem is Arab states, especially radical Arab states,
   want to destroy Israel. Recently there have been some
   progress, i.e. more Arab countries agree to compromise.
   Should US retreat from world affairs? In fact, historically
   before World War II, US was reluctant to participate the war.
   There were criticism particularly in Europe that had US
   joined the war earlier, the loss of World War II may be not
   as great. British and French appeasement policy toward
   Nazi's was widely criticized.
   
   Despite all religious background differences, those
   extremists attack is very evil. Almost all governments
   and peoples strongly condemn the terrorist act.
   
   One very troubling news is that mainland Chinese, through
   internet posting, newsreport, and comments, blame US policy
   for the reason of terrorist attack. Because Chinese government
   misinformation and lack of basic moral standard, many
   mainland Chinese believe that US had some blame. This
   is similar to in WW II blaming French for Nazi's invasion.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场