百家争鸣
为了方便阅读,博讯暂停广告播放,博迅需要您的支持。
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[值得中国律师学习的起诉书: 诉江泽民\李岚清\罗干\刘京\王茂林损害赔偿两千万加元]
郭国汀律师专栏
·言论自由受到了严重威胁
·思想自由的哲学基础/郭国汀
·冲破精神思想的牢狱--自由要义/郭国汀
·我们为什么要争言论自由权?/南郭
·中共党员是罪犯 无耻无行文人是重罪犯!
***思想自由与宗教信仰自由
·人类不平等的起源究竟是什么?
·论中共专制暴政下的宗教信仰自由(英文)
·宗教是统治阶级麻醉人民的鸦片吗?
·祝愿祖国早日实现真正的自由!
·关于司法公正的讨论郭国汀律师在北大法律信息网上发表了非常危险的错误观点应该予以驳斥!
·我的真实心声
·中共当局封杀言论为那般?
·六四的记忆
·谈中华文化与道德重建(四)
·中国百年最伟大的文字!
·郭国汀:为刘荻女英雄辩护吾当仁不让!
·只有思想言论出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
·只有说真话的民族才有前途
·一个能思想的人才是力量无边的人/南郭
·思想之可贵在于其独立性
·独立思想是最美的
·思想的高度统一是人类社会之大敌
·统一思想之谬误由来已久矣/南郭
·我的心里话--有感于杜导斌先生被捕
***民主研究
·民主就是[山头林立]?!
·质疑刘晓波先生盛赞俞可平民主论 郭国汀
·共和比民主更为根本
·共和民主宪政要旨
·什么是联邦主义民主宪政?
***中国民主运动研究
·郭国汀加入民主中国阵线的公开声明
·论公推中国民运政治领袖的必要性
·论公推自荐公选民运政治精神领袖的紧迫性
·中国民主运动领袖论?答方文武先生
·关于筹建过渡政府与公选民运领袖问题的讨论
·关于民运领袖过渡政府与程序正义的争论
·历史功臣还是历史罪人?
·关于成立临时或流亡政府我的原则与立场
·中国民主运动到底需要什么样的政治精神领袖?
·谁是中国民主运动政治精神领袖的最佳人选?
·谁是中共极权专制暴政最害怕的劲敌?
·中国民运长期四分五裂的根源何在?
·郭国汀:唯有程序正义才能根治中国民运四分五裂顽症
·自私是否人的本性?
·郭国汀:汪兆钧信是中共内部爆炸的一颗原子弹
·反抗中共专制暴政的先驱者与英雄(修正)
·相会伟大的刘文辉烈士英魂
·敬请胡锦涛先生立即制止下属恶意疯狂攻击南郭之电脑
·"六四领袖去死吧!"及 " 逢共必反、逢华必反"?!
·草根吾友欲往何处去?
·真实的陈泱潮故事
·陈泱潮自传之二
·强烈推荐国人必读之最佳政论文
·答小溪先生质疑
·驳斥草虾兼与草根商榷!
·语言风格——关于袁红冰改良还是革命的争论
·就袁红冰之《改良还是革命》与申先生的论战/郭国汀
·英雄人格哲学—袁红冰《自由在落日中》读后
·划时代的政论——简评袁红冰《改良,还是革命?》
·为什么袁红冰之《改良,还是革命?》是划时代的政论?
·伟大的中国文化复兴宣言 郭国汀
·罗马尼亚35天革命成功真相
·关于宣讲人权公约基金申请推荐函
·必须立即终止反动透顶的行政官员任命制
·关于暴力革命答深山质疑
·自由中国论坛的不锈钢老鼠到底是什么角色?
***陈泱潮思想评论
·大器晚成——《陈泱潮文集选读》序
·《造化故事》陈泱潮文选第一集
·铁幕惊雷《特权论》陈泱潮文选第二集
·《偃武修文重新建国纲领》陈泱潮文选第三集
·《时政评论》陈泱潮文选第四集
·《天命前定》陈泱潮文选第五集
·《上帝之道》陈泱潮文选第六集
·中国争人权言论表达自由权的先驱者与英雄名录
·民主革命论 陈泱潮
·《特权论的》精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判
·特权论的精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判 郭国汀
·枭雄黑道乱世的一百年!郭国汀
·中共党员是罪犯!——评贺卫方教授的中共分成两派说
·论无产阶级民主制度下的两党制
·陈泱潮评胡锦涛
·陈泱潮论江泽民
·我为什么特别推崇陈泱潮先生的思想理论?
·天才论/郭国汀
·彻底揭露批判中共极权专制流氓暴政本质的奇书
·极权专制暴政的根源/郭国汀
·共产极权专制暴政的典型特征——简评陈泱潮的《特权论》
·论共产极权专制政权的本质——三评陈泱潮天才著作《特权论》
·何谓“无产阶级专政”
·陈泱潮论马克思主义的无产阶级专政 郭国汀
·论初级无产阶级专政 /新南郭点评
·论高级无产阶级专政 郭国汀
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告

(值得中国律师学习的起诉书: 诉江泽民\李岚清\罗干\刘京\王茂林损害赔偿两千万加元)接上页博讯www.peacehall.com

   · The jus cogens norm against genocide
   · The jus cogens norm against torture
   · Articles 6 and 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, defining genocide and crimes against humanity (Canada implemented this through the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act in 2000)
   · The United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
   · The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (and as a result of Article 4, requiring ratifying states to ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law, Canada added section 269.1 of the Criminal Code)
   · The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (virtually all Articles)
   · The United Nations Charter: preamble affirming fundamental human rights and the worth and dignity of the human person; Article 1 affirming respect for and promotion of equal rights and the obligation of member states to act accordingly; Articles 55 and 56 affirming universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.
   · The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
   o Article 6 prohibiting genocide
   o Article 7 prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment
   o Article 9 guaranteeing the right to liberty and security of the person and prohibiting arbitrary arrest or detention
   o Article 14 guaranteeing a fair and public hearing and equality before courts and tribunals
   o Article 15 prohibiting being held guilty for acts that do not constitute crimes
   o Article 17 prohibiting arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence
   o Article 18 guaranteeing freedom of thought, conscience and religion
   o Article 19 guaranteeing freedom of expression
   o Article 21 guaranteeing the right of peaceful assembly
   o Article 22 guaranteeing freedom of association
   o Article 26 guaranteeing equality before the law and equal protection of the law
   13. The Plaintiffs bring this action in Ontario for the following reasons, which the Plaintiffs assert constitute reason to ground jurisdiction in Ontario:
   a. All Plaintiffs are currently residents of Ontario.
   b. All Plaintiffs have sustained and continue to sustain damage in Ontario arising from torts committed by the Defendants, and thus rely on Rule 17.02(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure of Ontario.
   c. The Chinese legal and judicial systems, and all elements of China’s state apparatus and governance, at all levels, have been co-opted and employed by the Defendants in the persecution of Falun Gong, including of the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs are unable to seek or obtain justice or remedy in China for the wrongs inflicted on them.
   d. The persecution of Falun Gong continues to this day in China, and the Plaintiffs legitimately fear for their safety and lives should they return to China to pursue any claim there.
   e. The very nature of this case – persecution and torture by those in positions of significant power, authority and influence – necessitates action in a jurisdiction where abuse of such power is not permitted to determine the outcome.
   f. Article 14 of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which states in part:
   1. Each State Party shall ensure in its legal system that the victim of an act of torture obtains redress and has an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation including the means for as full rehabilitation as possible…
   2. Nothing in this Article shall affect any right of the victim or other person to compensation which may exist under national law.
   OVERVIEW OF THE PLAINTIFFS
   14. The Plaintiff Mr. Kunlun Zhang was a citizen of Canada at time of his detentions and torture in China, having returned to China on a temporary basis to care for a seriously ill relative. All the other Plaintiffs were citizens of China at the time of their detentions and torture in China. But two Plaintiffs, Mr. Shenli Lin and Mr. Lizhi He, had applied for immigration visas before their detentions and torture; both their applications were accepted, but unfortunately both were detained in China for the last time before they could leave for Canada on these visas. All the other Plaintiffs (Ms. Changzhen Sun, Ms. Na Gan and Mr. Tianqi Li,) had close family or friends permanently residing in Canada at the time and all made the decision some time after the persecution against them began to move to Canada as soon as they were able and eventually to attain Canadian citizenship, in order to join their family or friends here and to escape the persecution in China. Thereafter all these Plaintiffs moved to Canada as soon as they were able, attaining or pursuing to date either refugee or landed immigrant status.
   15. The Plaintiff Mr. Kunlun Zhang was born on January 25, 1941, in Huantai County, Shandong province in China. He was a renowned sculptor and an associate professor of arts at Shandong Art University in China. He emigrated to Canada in 1989, became a landed immigrant in 1990, and became a Canadian citizen in 1995, taking a post as a visiting scholar at McGill University. His wife joined him in Canada in 1990, their two daughters arrived in Canada in 1992, and all have permanently resided in Canada since their arrival. Mr. Zhang returned to China in April 1996, on a temporary basis, to help care for his mother-in-law who was seriously ill. His mother-in-law remained alive but very ill until her death in 2000, requiring Mr. Zhang to stay in China during this period to care for her (his wife, who had landed immigrant status in Canada, was able to join him there later). During this stay, Mr. Zhang was arrested and detained without trial in China on five occasions beginning July 1999. He was sentenced to three years in labour camp in November 2000 and was released in January 2001 after intervention by the Canadian government, Amnesty International and others. He was then allowed to return home to Canada. While detained he was tortured. At the time of his torture he was a citizen of Canada, and is today. He currently resides with his wife in Ottawa, Ontario.
   16. The Plaintiff Mr. Shenli Lin was born on November 16, 1954 in Shanghai, China. He was detained in China first in July 1999, again in December 1999, then again in January 2000 for a period of two years during which he was tortured. At the time of the torture he was a citizen of China, but he had applied for an immigration visa in June 1999 to move to Canada because his wife was a Canadian citizen (he had married Ms. Jinyu Li, who had emigrated from China to Canada in 1989 and attained Canadian citizenship in 1993, having met Ms. Li during her trip to visit her family in China in 1998). Mr. Lin’s visa application was accepted on or about January 25, 2000, two days after Mr. Lin was detained for the third time. After his release from a labour camp in January 2002, Mr. Lin emigrated to Canada to join his wife. As of January 21, 2004 he is a landed immigrant of Canada. He and his wife currently reside in Toronto, Ontario.
   17. The Plaintiff Mr. Lizhi He was born on March 17, 1964 in Minqin County, Gansu Province, China. He was arrested and detained in China, first in March 2000, and the last time in July 2000 for a period of three and a half years. He was tortured while detained. He was a citizen of China at the time of the torture, but in 1999 he and his wife Li Zhang had applied for immigration visas to move to Canada, which were accepted on or about July 8, 2000. Shortly after this date Mr. He was detained for the last time in China. In May 2001, his wife left China to move to Canada, two days before her immigration visa would have expired. After his release from his final detention, Mr. He moved to Canada on or about May 21, 2004 to join his wife, at which time he became (and still is) a landed immigrant of Canada. He currently resides with his wife in Toronto, Ontario.
   18. The Plaintiff Mr. Tianqi Li was born on August 7, 1946 in Shanghai, China. He was first detained in China in October 2000 for 10 months, then transferred to and detained in a forced labour camp for 14 months. He was tortured while detained. He was a citizen of China at the time of the torture, but came to Canada on or about November 22, 2003 on a visitor’s visa to join his close friend, Plaintiff Mr. Shenli Lin. He has applied for refugee status here, and his application is being processed. He currently resides in Toronto, Ontario with Shenli Lin and his wife.

[上一页][目前是第2页][下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场