百家争鸣
为了方便阅读,博讯暂停广告播放,博迅需要您的支持。
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[Anti-communist sentiments landed Chinese lawyer in an asylum]
郭国汀律师专栏
·为赖昌星遗返案我的宣誓证词
·中华全国律师协会的实质----被阉割与自宫
·郭国汀 司法公正的前提条件
***郭国汀论法官与律师
·悼念前最高法院大法官冯立奇教授逝世四周年
·法官律师与政党 郭国汀
·尊敬的法官大人你值得尊敬吗?!
·郭国汀与中国律师网友论法官
·法官的良心与良知/南郭
·法官!这是我法律生涯的终极目标! 郭国汀
·律师与法官之间究竟应如何摆正关系?
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!/郭国汀
·从 “中国律师人”说开去
·唯有科班出身者才能当律师?!答王靓华高论/南郭
·律师的责任——再答李洪东/南郭
·中国律师朋友们幸福不会从天降!/南郭
·我为北京16位律师喝彩!郭国汀
·郭国汀律师与网上警官的交锋
·我是中国律师我怕谁?!
·郭国汀 好律师与称职的律师
·温柔抗议对郭律师的ID第二次查封
·第五次强烈抗议中国律师网无理非法封杀郭律师的IP
·中国律师网为何封杀中国律师?
·中律网封杀删除最受网友们欢迎的郭国汀律师
·最受欢迎的写手却被中共彻底封杀
·我为何暂时告别中国律师网?
·我的告别书—再见中国律师网
·南郭:律师的文学功底
·中国最需要什么样的律师?
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!
·将律师协会办成真正的民间自治组织
·强烈挽留郭国汀律师/小C
·勇敢地参政议政吧 中国律师!
·the open letter to Mr.Hu Jintao from Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada for Gao Zhisheng
·自宫与被阉割的中国律师网 /南郭
·做律师首先应当做个堂堂正正的人——南郭与王靓华的论战/南郭
·呵!吉大,我心中永远的痛!
·再答小C君/南郭
·凡跟郭国汀贴者一律入选黑名单!
·历史不容患改!历史专家不敢当,吾喜读中国历史是实
·思想自由的益处答迷风先生
·答迷风先生
·答经纬仪之民族败类之指责,汝不妨教教吾辈汝之哲学呀?
·南郭曾是"天才"但一夜之间被厄杀成蠢才,如今不过是个笨蛋耳!
·答时代精英,
·长歌独行至郭国汀律师公开函
***南郭独立评论
·【郭國汀評論】第一集我為什麼要為法輪功辯護
·【郭国汀评论】第二集从自焚伪案看中共的邪教本质
·《郭国汀评论》第三集国际专家学者如何看待法轮功?
·【郭國汀評論】第四集:中共為何懼怕曾節明
·【郭國汀評論】第五集:憶通律師事務所遭遇停業的真正原因
·《郭国汀评论》第六集中共暴政与精神病
·《郭国汀评论》第七集:江泽民是货真价实的汉奸卖国贼
·《郭国汀评论》第八集:从陈世忠的“第二种忠诚”看中共司法黑暗
·【郭國汀評論】第九集-苏家屯事件(盗卖法轮功学员人体器官)是中共的滑鐵盧
·《郭国汀评论》第十集:蘇家屯事件(活体盗卖法轮功学员人体器官)是中共的滑鐵盧(下集)
·《郭国汀评论》:第十二集:爱中华必须反共!
·《郭国汀评论》第十三集:为六四“反革命暴徒”抗辩
·《郭国汀评论》第十四集:什么是我们为之奋斗的民主?
·《郭国汀评论》第十五集:为邓玉娇抗辩(上)
·《郭国汀评论》第十六集 我为邓玉娇抗辩(下)
·《郭国汀评论》第十七集:强烈谴责中共暴政迫害中国人权律师
·《郭國汀評論》第十八集:中共专制暴政正在毁灭中国生态环境
·《郭国汀评论》第十九集:论中共暴政
·《郭国汀评论》第二十集:论中共暴政(下)
·《郭国汀评论》第二十二集:论法轮功精神运动的伟大意义
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权的非法性《郭国汀评论》第23集
·郭国汀评论:为什么说中共政权是个流氓暴政?
·郭国汀评论:胡锦涛不是在执政而是在犯罪
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权是个超级暴政
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权是个极权暴政
·郭国汀评论:论中共专制暴政下的酷刑
·郭国汀评论第二十八集:中共极权专制暴政下不可能有任何新闻自由
·郭国汀评论:论中共是个犯罪组织
·郭国汀评论:论中共暴政体制性司法腐败
·郭国汀评论:论中共暴政体制性司法腐败(下)
·陈良宇是中共残酷政治斗争的牺牲品
·郭国汀 国人民族主义乃中共误导所致
·人民公社万岁?!--《辉煌的幻灭》读后感
·如何成为一名伟大的,优秀的法律人?网友评论
·如何成为一名对社会有用的人
·谁杀死了中国伟大的诗人杨春光?
·忆对我前半生影响至深的三位老师
·A Letter to a Chinese
·不敢讲真话的民族注定是受奴役遭天谴的软骨头的劣等种族
***大学生\知识分子与爱国愤青研究
·大中学生及留学生必读:胡锦涛崇尚的古巴政治是什么玩意?!
·是否应彻底否定中华传统文
·向留学生及大中学生推荐一篇好文
·向留学生大学生强烈推荐杰作驳中共政权威权化的谬论
·强烈谴责中共党控教育祸国殃民的罪孽!--闻贺卫方教授失业有感
·學術腐敗是一個國家腐敗病入膏肓的明證
·中共专制暴政长期推行党化奴化教育罪孽深重
·教育国民化、私有化而非政治化党化是改革教育最佳途径之一
·论当代中国大学生和爱国愤青的未来
·给中国大学生留学生及爱国愤青们开书单
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Anti-communist sentiments landed Chinese lawyer in an asylum

   Anti-communist sentiments landed Chinese lawyer in an asylum
   by Matthew Gauk
   
   Chinese lawyer Guo Guoting spent 21 days of his youth in a mental hospital for criticizing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), an experience that nearly destroyed his ability to think for himself.
   

   
   As soon as he got out, Guo, went back to school. He studied and read and worked constantly to prove that his thoughts were right—that they were valid.
   
   
   “My personal history can more vividly say what the human rights situation in China is, the true situation,” said Guo, during an Oct. 11 lecture at UVic.
   
   
   A senior Chinese maritime lawyer turned human rights lawyer who now lives in Canada, Guo spoke of his own life as a microcosm of human rights and the rule of law in China today. In his homeland, Guo came from a so-called “black family.”
   
   
   “In China, if someone came from this family they cannot get a job. They cannot get an education,” explained Guo. “Only after Chairman Mao passed away could I get a chance to take the examination and go into university.”
   It was 1980 when Guo was accepted to university—a rare opportunity, in his family. In 1984, Guo’s thinking changed and he criticized the CCP, Marxism, and Maoist thought. Without any argument, he was forced into a mental hospital.
   
   
   “I was confused during that time, I thought. I only talked about my mind, my thoughts,” recalls Guo. He had questioned the basis of the law. He thought it should be about justice, fairness, and complementing natural law, but saw the law being used instead to satisfy the will of the Party and the ruling class.
   
   
   Over the next 20 years, Guo spent much of his free time reading and searching for justification for his ideology. He practiced law, focusing on international trade, international maritime law, and marina insurance. He was at the top of his field, and was even named the top maritime lawyer in China in 2002 by the international law guide Legal 500.
   
   
   “Finally, I think the wisdom is coming back, the thought is coming back, the energy is coming back. And of course, I think, I will stand up again,” he said.
   
   
   Guo became interested in human rights law. He knew he would earn little or nothing. He knew he would face heavy political, economic, and mental pressures, but Guo was going to give it all up for a few university students.
   
   
   “Many people don’t understand. As a maritime lawyer, you can live a very easy, a very comfortable life. But what actually turned me was the Internet,” he said.
   
   
   Guo stumbled upon some overseas news sites in 2003 and read about a number of young university students arrested in China for writing articles criticizing the Communist Party and the Chinese political and legal systems. Guo looked up what the students wrote to find out more about their ideas. “Their ideas are basically the same as mine were,” he said.
   
   
   While China’s constitutional law states that Chinese citizens are entitled to basic human rights, the right to free speech and a free press, this is not necessarily the case in reality.
   
   
   “They have no such rights at all,” said Guo. “In this way I think it is time for me to do something to help the country, to help China, to set up the true rule of law and human rights. So I offer myself as a defense lawyer.”
   
   
   Guo decided to defend a number of university students and other “political criminals,” including members of the controversial religious group Falun Gong.
   
   
   “Without such freedoms, China is not a human being country. It’s only an animal country, maybe it’s a slavery country,” said Guo of the strong beliefs that compelled him to take action.
   
   
   Guo’s most recent case was defending Chinese journalist Shi Tao, who was charged with “divulging state secrets abroad” earlier this year. Shortly before the case began, Guo’s office was searched and closed, his family was searched, and his computer and personal journal confiscated. He was charged with disturbing the social order and put under house arrest for two-and-a-half months before being driven out of the country.
   
   
   “My conclusion is that I’m very disappointed. In China, there are no human rights,” he said. “If anyone dares to openly criticize the Communist Party or government policy, they are in danger of losing their job or being put into prison.”
   
   
   Guo also expressed his astonishment that he, a senior international lawyer and a law professor at three universities, could not protect his own human rights.
   
   
   The Canadian government offered to allow him into the country after he was exiled.

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场